Bill Gates relationship with President Obama can be likened to the relationship of media magnate with British prime ministers. It is for this reason, Gates' expeditions into the world of ‘philanthropy is questionable -- highly questionable.
The recent announcement of Microsoft's first time alliance with Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, GAVI, at a conference co-hosted by the British Government, all of a sudden is giving top priority to children around the world who die from ‘vaccine-preventable' diseases like dysentery, and pneumonia. As countries like Brazil and Japan make pledges, one wonders what the sudden excitement is, though a change of heart is plausible. However cynicism rings loud and clear especially when President of Liberia, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf makes comments like the following in a written statement"
"Today is an important moment in our collective commitment to protecting children in developing countries from disease," said President of Liberia in a written statement.
Despite the fact that the targeted ‘diseases' (though not all were declared) are diseases that can easily be cured without vaccines, it is the natural order of things that human beings do get sick, and from that sickness gain some level of immunity, but branches of the allopathic communities seem to want to continue playing god, albeit after UNICEF made it known the astronomical profit multinational pharmaceutical companies make on vaccines the knee-jerk reaction to which is to slash prices to ensure their own profit-margin from under-developed and developing countries.
Could it be that the ‘excitement' is more to with staying afloat while people in the West are waking up slowly to the damaging side effects of many vaccines, some of which have never thoroughly been tested for long term effects! Or could it be a way to pacify resistance to the land grab virus that is infecting Western and Middle Eastern nations, one which South American nations warned the African nations about! One wonders how much this fits into the overly ambitious Gates Foundation's Global Health Program.
The Global Health Program
When it comes to global health, one thinks of the U.N. and such organizations, not the initiative of one man. Such is the hard earned wealth of Bill Gates that he can consider such a philanthropic idea. After all, in Islam, it is the rizq, sustenance of Allah, that has been given to the rich to play their role in establishing a societal equilibrium concerning the poor. Therein, it is natural to consider the poor of one's own country, but to consider the whole world!
Eugenicists will eagerly seek to further such an initiative. As Gates stated:
"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [number of 9 billion] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent. But there we see an increase of about 1.3 [billion]."
The reasoning behind this goes deeper as Gates considers that this will greatly contribute towards bringing the projected population growth from 2.2 billion down to 1.3 billion on the basis of human Co2 emissions - yes human Co2 emissions!
"Until we get near to zero [carbon emissions]" he claimed, "the temperature will continue to rise" - which he said would lead to "extremely bad" consequences...
"Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent," Gates said at a TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) conference in 2010.
Given the recent U.N. declaration that the holes in the ozone layers have stopped, Bill Gates may have been working in the IT industry for too long, and needs to touch base with the reality that man cannot predict the future, and that there is a greater power. One wonders if in his calculations he has included the current global death rate whether man-made or as a result of natural disasters. With a history of funding well-known pro-abortion programs, why set to do apply the same intention in a country other than one's own, whereby there are significant issues pertaining to whole families living on the streets, and where increasingly many cannot afford healthcare? Not that one would want to inflict such an inhuman campaign on others, regardless where they come from, and regardless of their status, after all the one thing that God gave us, which seems to be amiss in the Global Health Program is the right to choose. Real choice means being informed, not just about the vaccine, but the nature of the vaccine, and the possible consequences, especially if people are not going to be tested beforehand for suitability. Vaccinosis is something that many do not here about, instead one hears about the importance of vaccines. Vaccinosis is a reaction to a vaccine, which can be mild or it can be acute. A mild reaction includes fever, respiratory problems, vomiting, digestive problems, headaches, swelling in the area vaccinated, fainting or seizures. An acute reaction to a vaccine causes urinary problems, problems with the kidneys, allergies, Attention Deficit Disorder, eczema, bowel dysfunction, autism, asthma, learning problems, or reproductive problems or the problem may defer to the offspring, amongst other reactions.
To further the global sterilization campaign, ideas such as directing sharp blasts of ultrasound to a man's scrotum, rendering him infertile for 6 months is under consideration - this may sound harmless enough, but as many know ultrasound has been used as a tool for diagnosis since the 1970s, but ultrasound can cause negative as well as positive pressure on the object of focus. The pressure exerted causes molecules to both push and pull away from each other, which can lead to cavities in biological tissue, in fact on an ethical basis, experiments on humans cannot be carried out!
Another program funded by the Foundation towards reducing mass sterilization involves penetrating nanoparticles through human skin to deliver the vaccine. One thought that the problem was not the delivery of vaccines, but vaccines themselves. The researchers are Carlos Alberto Guzman of the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in Germany and Claus-Michael Lehr and Steffi Hansen of the Helmholtz-Institute for Pharmaceutical Research. The idea is that vaccine are to be delivered as a spray to be triggered by the sweat glands, and it has been postulated that this method opens the door to being sprayed without consent, and without knowledge.
In the U.S., where there was only a 49% take up of the anti-flu vaccination program for 2010-11, in Australia where it is now winter, there has been an 80% drop in take up. Parents have had enough of their children being used as field experiments with increased cases of vaccinosis with vaccines like Fluvax which triggers febrile convulsions, and Vaxigrip, and Influvac which triggers diarrhoea and vomiting, the symptoms of which are early signs of the formation of more serious diseases.
With all the emergencies and crises going on in the world, a pledge of US$4.3bn for the Microsoft-GAVI vaccination program might become a reality and always there are takers who do not consider what the all round implications will mean. If flu vaccines like Fluzone, which contains the H1N1 virus are making people more ill to the point one can contract Guillain-Barré syndrome, the flu virus keeps on developing resistance to certain flu vaccines, though some people might suffer not any side effects, on mass, the only real benefit is to the flu virus itself, and the companies that stand to profit!