Video Bar

Loading...

Friday, July 29, 2011

7/29/2011 - A real depopulation event, right now... really

Depopulation as a real and viable plan... 

Rumors of a conspiracy to depopulate the US, if not the world, have been circulating since the early/mid 1990s. Stories and photos of apparent concentration camps and huge piles of molded plastic coffins have been around for just as long. 

Up until now, none of it made any sense. The government had never made any real moves to decommission our constitution and/or disarm the population. We were just too comfortable to even consider anything like open revolt. Even as bad as the politics got, with one president being held in contempt for perhaps stealing the 2000 election and another for maybe not even being a natural born American, we were never close to such a response. 

Natural disasters came and went. Katrina all but wiped the US gulf coast from the map in 2005. The hated FEMA was everywhere but... no concentration camps were manifested. 

Local police forces have taken on the look and feel of paramilitary, but aside from acting like overbearing thugs at times, there was never any barbed wire check points. 

It just never came together. 

But I think this may be about to change. 

We may be on the verge of a real depopulation event that is going to begin by killing off a great number of the easiest-to-eliminate. 

So, how do you kill off millions and do it so nobody really cares? 

You default the nation and cease Social Security payments to those who paid into the program their entire lives. The elderly, the handicapped, military vets and their surviving spouses who can no longer pay bills, buy food and needed medicines, many of these will eventually die as a result. It's almost an inarguable outcome. 

If I'm not mistaken, there are something like 54 million SS recipients right now. The first effect of killing a good number of these people is that the government is going to save billions of dollars from monthly payments that are no longer required. 

Now, don't expect those who don't die right away, to hobble to Washington in protest. It's just not gonna happen. And with the advent of the electronic voting machines, ballot totals can be manipulated long before they are ever officially counted. There will be no recourse. 

54 million Americans who are apt to vote, will be lopped right off the top. 
54 million Americans will be eliminated from the equation. 

But, it doesn't have to stop there. If the government can find a way to default the national debt and betray those who paid into this program all their working lives, they can take it a step further. 

Imagine now that the FDIC fails and your money... in every bank big and small, simply vanished with those institutions. Even those who retain some material wealth, would find that the cash is worthless. No food, no gasoline, no nothing. 

Yeah, now you can see people protesting, the paramilitary police taking them to collection centers and bodies being loaded into those boxes. 

*Deep breath* 

Again, this goes back to the 1990s... and could lead one to consider that it was all planned for a long, long time. 

So, here we are with this impending default, a threatened cessation of SS and Medicare and VA payments, the potential of a slow, malingering misery and the ultimate death of millions of older and disabled Americans that, in turn, saves Uncle Sam billions. 

In one horribly repulsive sense, it's all really quite brilliant. 

The NWO wins this one.




Why would you get rid of the people that vote? They are the people that believe in the system. 


You get rid of them because,
a. it saves billions in SS, Medicare and VA payments that won't come due later. You don't send monthly treasury checks to dead people. that money goes back to the government.
b. you reduce the number of non-productive citizens. It doesn't matter what they did when they were younger or healthier. It's about what have you done for me lately.
c. i can't pretend to have all the answers... this isn't even an opinion. it's just something that seems to fit like a glove right now.



Bear in mind that the reason this is happening is because the nation defaults on its debt. One of the first effects is going to be massive inflation. people are going to be scrambling to save themselves.

As for caring? We pack our elderly into burial vaults called nursing homes and forget them. Without SS coming in to pay the bills for these poor folks, what do you think is gonna happen? 



Getting rid of the people who depend on Social Security is part of making society and life as we know it sustainable.

they feel the need to get rid of the sick and elderly people so they can restructure society. Remember Kissinger's words about us being "useless eaters".
I encourage you to check this out. TPTB do not believe that the system and society as it is today is sustainable, which is going to be a catch term for future plans and sacrifices. 



http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread733820/pg1


Preparation for the Four Scenarios is Under Way


 Here are the Four Scenarios:
Here's Planned-opolis: www.youtube.com...

Here's Sprawl-ville: www.youtube.com...

Here's Renew-abad: www.youtube.com...

Here's Communi-city: www.youtube.com... 

As many of you know, I've been watching the mortgage/housing crisis quite closely. I find it very worrying on many levels, but I've had a theory ever since watching the Four Scenarios, which Bank of America has endorsed as well as many other companies. These videos were originally posted from another thread a while back, but I'm unable to locate it. I'll keep looking though because the person who posted them should get credit and that thread should be linked with this one.
Now, with that being said, ever since I watched the videos, I've had a gut feeling that the housing crisis is step one for moving in this intended direction. I believe that we're now seeing proof and will see further evidence that the NWO is now getting things ready for one or more of these scenarios to be created.

Here is an article from today's news:
www.bloomberg.com... 


Bank of America Corp. (BAC), faced with a glut of foreclosed and abandoned houses it can’t sell, has a new tool to get rid of the most decrepit ones: a bulldozer.

The biggest U.S. mortgage servicer will donate 100 foreclosed houses in the Cleveland area and in some cases contribute to their demolition in partnership with a local agency that manages blighted property. The bank has similar plans in Detroit and Chicago, with more cities to come, and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Fannie Mae are conducting or considering their own programs. 


I believe that the Banksters and our government have been preparing to restructure our cities in order to bring about one or more of the scenarios for sustainability.

Remember that word: SUSTAINABILITY. This is a word you are going to hear more and more of in the weeks and months to come. You will hear it in relation to the economy, business, services, and, of course, population.

I sincerely believe that the designed (yes, designed) housing crisis was the first contractions and birth pains of the NWO bringing about their plans for a sustainable society. Now, with today's article about foreclosure demolition, we're seeing the crowning/birth of sustainable cities. There's just too much evidence for this to be ignored.

After watching the four scenarios, which would you want to live in? I figure recycle-abad is the one I'd find most livable in my opinion. But, I'd still rather live in the country where my closest neighbor is at least one mile away. But, I digress.

Here's another article about Egypt's Garbage City and how it has been for the people here since the uprising:
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Is this article trying to scare us into fearing revolution because it will leave us with unsustainable amounts of trash everywhere? Is this change we can believe in?

All of what I'm presenting falls under the category of predictive programming. TPTB are ramping up and attempting to make us believe that revolution leads to decay and squalor. They also want you to believe that your house is not important, so you need to get out and let them bulldoze it to create a better city and lifestyle for everyone. These old designs just aren't sustainable anymore.

I believe, from what I've been seeing in the past two to three years, that TPTB have a plan and we're going to participate whether we want to or not.

Thoughts on this theory?
Which of the four scenarios would you rather live in if you didn't have any other choices? 





Here's another article in regards to how Detroit is being restructured:
www.cnbc.com... 


DETROIT - Detroit neighborhoods with more people and a better chance of survival will receive different levels of city services than more blighted areas under a plan unveiled Wednesday that some residents fear may pit them against each other for scarce resources. 


This is scary to say the least. It is enciting people to be competitive over resources. If you live in the ghetto, you're going to get nothing and will have to fight with the "haves" in order to survive. Class warfare at its finest.

I can't remember which scenario portrays the ghetto called Freedom, but what they're doing in Detroit is exactly what is portrayed in that cartoon. Vee mentions how people stay in the Freedom Ghetto, but she acts as though they're all stupid for wanting to stay there instead of moving into the sustainable city. The message here is to sell out to the NWO or live in decrepit conditions.
 
 Four Vision Of City Life In 2040 

here is one example 



As for Vee, she appears very British to me, and so I would assume that Vee relates to V which is in my opinion a Fauksian type conspiracy in it's own right to destroy democracy. 

this is the actual page where the vids come from www.forumforthefuture.org...
It does seem as though their is a monopoly going on with only a few companies participating. There is certainly something afoot here and it does seem as though they're all coming together to bring about this "sustainable" plan of theirs. 

Although I can't disagree with all that the videos depict, but the majority of it I do. The message they're sending is that there needs to be less choices and more of us being packed in like rats. Technology is going to keep everyone "in touch" and in the future it will be A-OK to do a hit and run on a bicyclist.  How pathetic! 

Everyone needs to pass these videos on to everyone they know so they are aware of why the housing crisis is happening. 2012 has obviously been a goal of theirs for a long time and I wouldn't doubt that their underground bunkers are cities just as we're seeing here.

 Here is yet another article backing the idea that we're moving towards these "sustainable" types of cities: 
hosted.ap.org...

More metro areas are booming into sprawling megalopolises. Barring fresh investment that could bring jobs, however, large swaths of the Great Plains and Appalachia, along with parts of Arkansas, Mississippi and North Texas, could face significant population declines. 


While rural America shrinks, larger U.S. metro areas have enjoyed double-digit percentage gains in population over the past several decades. Since 2000, metros grew overall by 11 percent with the biggest gains in suburbs or small- or medium-sized cities. In fact, of the 10 fastest-growing places, all were small cities incorporated into the suburbs of expanding metro areas, mostly in California, Arizona and Texas. 


"These new patterns suggest that there will be a blurring of boundaries as regions expand well beyond official government-defined definitions," Frey said. "People like to `have it all' - affordable housing in a smaller-town setting but in close proximity to jobs and big-city amenities such as specialized shopping, cultural events and major sports and entertainment venues."

"Many moderate-sized metro areas can fulfill all of these needs," he said. 


Just one more brick in the wall.

 
Explain how destabilizing an entire nation by wiping out the elderly members would be good for it in any way? Why not do that to third world countries through economic manipulation like what has been done for ages in Africa. Why do it on home soil? Please explain.


I suggest you look to history for your answer to this question. Perhaps Nazi Germany, but I am sure it is not the only time it has happened. 
Lessons from History: Euthanasia in Nazi Germany 

Over time Pfannmuller set up Hungerhauser (starvation houses) for the elderly. By the end of 1941, euthanasia was simply "normal hospital routine."


I suggest you read the whole short article. While they may be arguing against "mercy killing" and have their own agenda, their statements about Nazi Germany and comparisons to our own country are correct. This is simply the first place I found this but I am sure there are many other credible sources. 

Economic manipulation is already happening on a massive scale. They will wipe out anyone who does not benefit the agenda of those in control so wiping out the sick and elderly is actually economically beneficial although neither morally nor philosophically beneficial. 

If you really want to know why this is done, you should study psychopaths or ask someone like Adolph Hitler. 

No comments:

Post a Comment